t
Util good
Fried ’94 (Charles Fried “Rights and Wrongs as Absolute.” Absolutism and Its Consequentialist Critics. , p. 76. Ed. Haber 1994)
Everything ultimately reduces down to util – deontology is just based off of things that maximize happiness
-- Extinction outweighs all - ethics demands you evaluate our impacts first.
Seeley, ‘86
The Critique Of Realism Is Flat-Out Wrong–Realism Is Accurate, States Are Good, Their Aff Doesn’t Solve, And It Collapses Into Bloody Anarchy And Slaughter
SOLOMON 1996 (Hussein, Senior Researcher, Human Security Project, Institute for Defence Policy, “In Defence of Realism,” African Security Review, Vol 5, No 2, http://www.iss.co.za/pubs/ASR/5No2/5No2/InDefence.html)
Realism inevitable – human nature.
Thayer ‘4 -Ph.D, Fellow at Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University and consultant to Rand Corporation- [Bradley, “Darwin and International Relations: On the Evolutionary Origins of War and Ethnic Conflict”] p. 11-12
They can’t solve the discourse of danger—attacking a particular manifestation of it just causes it to shift to a new focal point
Tuathail, 96 (Gearoid, Department of Georgraphy at Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Political Geography, 15(6-7), science direct)
Second, the narrative that works this ground is an identity politics narrative that seeks to problematize the ‘metaphysics of presence’ found in US foreign policy.
Promotion of security is an ethical responsibility of government. Total security is impossible but limited security avoids a hell on earth.
Elshtain ‘3 (Jean Bethke, Prof. Social and Pol. Ethics – U. Chicago, “Just War Against Terror: The Burden of American Power in a Violent World”, p. 46-48)
Moving away from security creates new challengers and increases the risk of war
Doran, 99 (Charles, Professor of International Relations at Johns Hopkins University's School of Advanced International Studies, Survival, 1999, Summer, p. 148-9, proquest)
Abandoning security fails -–- all that will happen is that non-realist will be removed from office
Kavka ’87 (Gregory S., Prof – UC Irvine, Moral Paradoxes of Nuclear Deterrence, p. 86-87)
The US is toxic – any group that accepts assistance becomes discredited.
Joel Brinkley, staff writer for SF Gate, “How 'democracy' got to be a dirty word,” 4/5/2009, http://articles.sfgate.com/2009-04-05/opinion/17193126_1_democracy-promotion-moroccan-king-advance-democracy
The MB will use the plan to discredit liberal organizations, killing their election chances.
Mohamed Abdelbaky, an Egyptian journalist who specializes in democracy and human rights, 8-25-2011, “The Crisis of External Fudning of Egyptian Civil Society,” FIKRA Forum, http://fikraforum.org/2011/08/the-crisis-of-external-funding-of-egyptian-civil-society/
Neoliberalism not oppressive or exploitive – empirically proven
Bhagvati ‘4 (University Professor at Columbia University and Senior Fellow in International Economics at the Council on Foreign Relations [JagdishBhagwati, “In Defense of Globalization”. 2004. Overview, http://www.cfr.org/publication/6769/in_defense_of_globalization.html]
No impact – market rationality precludes the genocidal mentality that Santos analyzes.
Ratner – 84 (Leonard, prof., of law at USC, Hofstra Law Journal, Spring, p. 753-54)
Can’t solve neoliberalism – the right will co-opt the plan’s invigoration of public spaces to prevent a genuine societal transformation
Vincent 6 [Jonathan Vincent is a PhD candidate in American studies at the University of Illinois, where he teaches American literature and composition. “A Call to Arms in a Repressive Atmosphere of Educational Acquiescence”, Pedagogy 6.1 (2006) 189-198, JSTOR]
