1AC
First is Solvency –
The US must use a two track assistance regime in Egypt-providing security from extremist groups, and providing technical assistance for elections and the creation of political institutions
Michael Singh in 11 (managing director of the Washington Institute and a former senior director for Middle Eastern affairs at the National Security Council. Previously, Mr. Singh taught economics at Harvard University. He is currently serving as a term member of the Council on Foreign Relations, Harvard International Review, Change in the Middle East, Academic Search Premier)
This is not to say that each country
AND
other steps required to carry out sustainable reform.
NDI historically has been successful and currently has programs supporting election monitoring and technical assistance for the elections and establishing political parties.
National Democratic Institute in 11
Egypt; http://beta.ndi.org/egypt
NDI continues to maintain strong relationships with civil
AND
with which the two major parties operate internally.
But the NDI is short staffed and lacks resources to respond to all the requests for support.
Slavin in 11
Barbara; Inter Press Services Washington Correspondent; Mideast: U.S. 'Democracy' Advisors Suddenly in Demand; April 14; Global Issues; http://www.globalissues.org/news/2011/04/14/9287
Carpenter, now with the Washington Institute for
AND
programmes at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
And, the US is always key – it has unparalleled capacity and influence – grassroots connections are critical to improving US image.
Al-Oraibi and Russell in 11
Mina and Gerard; Washington, D.C. Bureau Chief for Asharq Al-Awsat, the world’s largest
pan-Arab daily newspaper and Research Fellow @ Harvard Kennedy School of Government respectively; The Trust Deficit: Seven Steps Forward for US-Arab Dialogue; Washington Quarterly Summer 2011
This article has addressed itself entirely to the
AND
principles, it can move in that direction.
Plan: The United States federal government should fully fund the National Democratic Institute for its programs on technical assistance in political organization and elections monitoring in Egypt.
Several scenarios, first is Democracy
The SCAF is executing smear campaigns against political parties and CSOs as a prelude to an attempt to rig the election – monitoring is key to check.
Hassan and Shenker in 11
Amro and Jack; journalist who writes regularly for The Guardian from Egypt. His work has covered India and Nepal, Central Asia, the Balkans, the US and Gaza, and has been published in a wide range of magazines and newspapers across the globe - including The Times, The Independent, The New Statesman and Monocle; Egyptian human rights groups accuse junta of smear campaign; http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/aug/24/egypt-human-rights-military
A list of 39 organisations have added their
AND
why our presence and monitoring will be crucial."
Without successful monitoring SCAF could rig the election to allow the Muslim Brotherhood to hold a majority
Halawa in 11 (Omar, Contributer Almasry Alyoum, “As Egypt rejects international election monitors, rights advocates fear fraud” )
A spokesperson for the ruling military council on
AND
and excluded independent groups from the monitoring process.
Muslim Brotherhood will erode Egypt - Israeli peace treaty and lure Israel into war
Hirsi Ali in 11 (resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute,the author of Infidel and Nomad and the founder of the AHA Foundation, “Will the Muslim Brotherhood Succeed Where Osama Failed?” summer 2011)
True, the Brotherhood’s leaders have insisted that
AND
states that do not share the Islamist vision.
Muslim Brotherhood win means Islamic encirclement of Israel and conflict
Hirsh in 11 (Michael, National Journal, “Mideast Uprisings Could Mean Grim Tidings for Israel” )
It's hardly surprising that many Israelis are jaded
AND
like standoff, as in the Palestinian territories.
And this will push Israel to take unilateral action against Egypt and Hamas.
Byman in 11 ( Daniel Byman, Professor in the Security Studies Program at Georgetown University, Research Director of the Saban Center tor Middle East Policy at Brookings, “Israel’s pessimistic view of the Arab Spring” )
Should pressure ease, and should Hamas—
AND
leaders prefer to avoid a confrontation with Israel.
Egypt-Israeli conflict escalates to nuclear war
Eldar in 3
Dan Eldar, adjunct research fellow at the Moshe Dayan Center for Middle Eastern and African Studies, Tel Aviv University, former senior analyst at the Israeli prime minister's office, “Egypt and Israel: A Reversible Peace,” The Middle East Quarterly, Fall 2003, pp. 57-65
In addition, there is a risk that
AND
did with dire consequences for the entire region.
Next is Stability
Stability is down now – limited capacities and personnel producing absence of security – clarity in legal structure, technical capacities, and monitoring are key.
Al-A’sar 8/8/11
Marwa; staff writer for The Daily News Egypt; ElBaradei criticizes 'unclear vision' in transition; The Daily News Egypt; http://thedailynewsegypt.com/egypt/elbaradei-criticizes-unclear-vision-in-transition.html
ElBaradei, also the former director of the
AND
to avoid any possibility of vote-rigging.
Egypt will be the lynchpin of the US’s Middle East strategy. Failure of the transition will set the entire region back and usher in a new wave of radicalism that disrupts stability
Kitfield in 11 (James, National Journal; 3/5/2011, p10-10, 1p, U.S. Faces Dynamic Instability in the Middle East, Academic Search Premier)
No one can predict the outcome of the
AND
would have dangerous consequences for the entire region."
And continued Egyptian instability or radicalism will cause a cascade of nuclear proliferation through MENA.
Sokolski in 11
Henry; executive director of The Nonproliferation Policy Education Center; Feb 8; Gimme Fuel, Gimme Fire: What the Egyptian revolt means for nuclear proliferation; The New Republic; http://www.tnr.com/article/82995/nuclear-weapons-middle-east-obama-mubarak
Even more dangerously, unlike Iraq, Syria
AND
states whose governments are likely to be destabilized.
Proliferations causes extinction – nuclear arms races and miscalculated nuclear war.
Utgoff in 2
(Deputy Director of the Strategy Forces, and Resources Division of the Institute for Defense Analyses, Victor, “Proliferation, Missile Defence, and American Ambitions,” Survival, Volume 44, Number 2, Summer)
First, the dynamics of getting to a
AND
the bodies of dead cities or even whole nations
US leadership in ME key to overall hegemony and guarantees the security of multiple middle eastern states
Haass and Indyk in 09 (Richard N., President of the Council on Foreign relations, and Martin, “Beyond Iraq: A New U.S. Strategy for the Middle East”, Council on Foreign Relations, )
This reduced regional influence has been reinforced by
AND
their leaders in working with the United States.
The United States is still an indispensible nation – it is economically and militarily secure as a global power
Ron Marks, Senior Vice President for Government Relations, Oxford-Analytica, June 1, 2010 10:55 AM, “The Decline Redux,” http://security.nationaljournal.com/2010/06/superpower-or-spendthrift.php#1589150
Ok, let's get some facts on the
AND
decline for awhile because this is getting boring.
Collapse of US leaderships means a laundry list of terrorism, radicalism, authoritarianism, and international conflict up to the use of nuclear weapons.
Kagan in 11
Robert Kagan. Senior Associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace “The Price of Power: The benefits of U.S. defense spending far outweigh the costs.” Jan 24, 2011, Vol. 16, No. 18. http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/price-power_533696.html?page=1
Today the international situation is also one of
AND
table and the table will not fall over.
No multi-polarity – collapse of hegemony causes global anarchic violence
Ferguson in 4
Niall, Professor of History at New York University's Stern School of Business and Senior fellow at the Hoover Institution; “A world without power,” Foreign Policy 143, p. 32-39, July-August
<But what if these esteemed theorists are
AND
and civilization's retreat into a few fortified enclaves.>
And last is Egyptian Foreign Policy
Egypt’s international role is key, what happens here shapes policy across the whole of the Middle East and North Africa – risking failure means a cascade of rebalanced and hostile relations in the Middle East with Iran, the US, and Israel.
Alterman 6/15/11
Jon B; senior fellow and director of the Middle East Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies; The Earthquake: How Egypt Emerges from Uncertainty; CSIS; http://csis.org/files/publication/110610_alterman_GlobalForecast2011.pdf
The stakes are surely high enough to provoke
AND
, and especially in sectors that create jobs.
And Egypt is a critical turning point for the zero sum battle between GCC states and Iran – the status quo means a Shi’a empire, a nuclear Iran, rapid Mid East proliferation. An authentically democratic Egypt with a robust secular base is the key to challenging Iranian supremacy.
Santini and Alessandri in 11
Ruth Hanau; Visiting Fellow with the Brookings Center on the United States and Europe (CUSE) expertise in European foreign policy, international security and Middle Eastern politics; Emiliano; Transatlantic Fellow at the German Marshall Fund; “Iran and Turkey after Egypt: Time for Regional Re-alignments?”; Center on the United States and Europe at Brookings
At present, the balance of power in
AND
Iran has long presented to the Middle East.
Iranian support networks and regional hegemony threaten the globe through international arms proliferation which sparks counter-proliferation as well as the potential for international and regional conflict that can include ICBMs and nuclear weapons.
Maginnis 7/12/11
Robert; retired Army lieutenant colonel, and a national security and foreign affairs analyst; U.S. Paving the Way for Iran Hegemony; Human Events; http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=44787
President Barack Obama’s wrongheaded Iran strategy virtually guarantees
AND
more dangerous place through its nonstop arms sales.