Contention 1: Auto Immunity
Democracy is its own worst enemy – its self-destructive tendencies will lead to its collapse
Haddad 04
Ass’t Prof of Philosophy at Fordham 2004 Samir Contretemps, Vol. 4 http://sydney.edu.au/contretemps/4september2004/haddad.pdf
However, the threats to democracy AND itself as from its ‘enemiesʼ.
This auto-immunity is exemplified by our orientation towards democracy and the revolutionary spirit of the Arab Spring. Despite clear signals that democracy as-is has collapsed the West continues to pursue assistance strategies which maintain the status quo. Assistance should be shifted to unequivocally support dissidents
Sharansky 11
chairman of the Jewish Agency for Israel 2011 Natan The Jewish Review of Books Number 5 http://www.jewishreviewofbooks.com/publications/detail/the-stakes-in-the-middle-east
Has the Muslim and Arab Spring AND the fatal choice of relegitimating dictatorship.
Thus the plan,
The United States federal government should fund and support International Cities of Refuge for dissidents and exiled persons from topically designated countries.
Advantage 1: Justice
Supporting Cities of refuge shifts the focus of democracy assistance from democracy as-is to democracy to come
Kelly 04
(ass’t prof of Philosophy and Literature at Florida Gulf Coast University 2004 Sean Contemporary Justice Review 7.4 EBSCOhost)
The cities become, exist as AND not-negotiated, but nonnegotiable.
Politics oriented around democracy to come are essential to turn the tides against democracy as a tool of neo-liberal capitalism – continuing to accept democracy as-is causes deferral of ethical responsibility
Mules 2010
Senior Lecturer in Cultural Studies at Central Queensland University and Adjunct Senior Lecturer in the School of English, Media Studies and Art History, The University of Queensland 2010 Warwick Derrida Today 3.1 http://www.euppublishing.com/doi/pdfplus/10.3366/drt.2010.0007
My argument, drawn from Jacques AND terms of what it might be.
Democracy to come necessitates a deconstructive ethos of justice
Derrida 2004
Jacques South Atlantic Quarterly 103.2/3 project muse
4. In Specters of MarxAND see PF 305–6)
Justice is the only undeconstructable impact – essential focus for policy making
McQuillan 09
Professor of Literary Theory and Cultural Analysis and Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at Kingston University, London 2009 Martin Deconstruction After 9/11, Routledge, pg. 85-87
Again to be for Justice is AND the death-cult of contemporary managerialism
Embracing an ethic of justice is essential to confront the massive every day instances of violence which support the international system.
Derrida 1995
dir d’etudes @ Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales Jacques, The Gift of Death 83-7
What is thus found at work AND nothing more than a murderer?
This everyday violence has escalated to global war
McQuillan 09
Professor of Literary Theory and Cultural Analysis and Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at Kingston University, London 2009 Martin Deconstruction After 9/11, Routledge, pg. 85-87
This is not just a call AND he the century of the other.
These everyday forms of violence are the largest proximate cause of conflict and genocide
Scheper-Hughes and Bourgois 04
(Prof of Anthropology @ Cal-Berkely; Prof of Anthropology @ UPenn, Nancy and Philippe, Introduction: Making Sense of Violence, in Violence in War and Peace, pg. 19-22)
This large and at first sight AND ; and reversed feelings of victimization).
Deconstructive politics are key to solve
McQuillan 09
Professor of Literary Theory and Cultural Analysis and Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at Kingston University, London 2009 Martin Deconstruction After 9/11, Routledge, pg. xii-xiii
Fifthly, a number of the AND the material processes of the political.
Contention 2: Decision-making
The resolution is our situated-ness – must call for democracy to come from within it
Mules 2010
Senior Lecturer in Cultural Studies at Central Queensland University and Adjunct Senior Lecturer in the School of English, Media Studies and Art History, The University of Queensland 2010 Warwick Derrida Today 3.1 http://www.euppublishing.com/doi/pdfplus/10.3366/drt.2010.0007
The coming of free sense is AND ’ (Nancy 1997, 93).
Simply the act of affirming the plan solves democracy to come
Mules 2010
Senior Lecturer in Cultural Studies at Central Queensland University and Adjunct Senior Lecturer in the School of English, Media Studies and Art History, The University of Queensland 2010 Warwick Derrida Today 3.1 http://www.euppublishing.com/doi/pdfplus/10.3366/drt.2010.0007
I have suggested that democracy cannot AND unavoidably must be already be there.
Decision is the utmost ethical responsibility – they must be made unconditionally
Mules 2010
Senior Lecturer in Cultural Studies at Central Queensland University and Adjunct Senior Lecturer in the School of English, Media Studies and Art History, The University of Queensland 2010 Warwick Derrida Today 3.1 http://www.euppublishing.com/doi/pdfplus/10.3366/drt.2010.0007
The fact of democracy is the AND democracy in the name of freedom?
Affirmation is key to creating a political space for democracy to come because it engages in a politics of free being
Mules 2010
Senior Lecturer in Cultural Studies at Central Queensland University and Adjunct Senior Lecturer in the School of English, Media Studies and Art History, The University of Queensland 2010 Warwick Derrida Today 3.1 http://www.euppublishing.com/doi/pdfplus/10.3366/drt.2010.0007
A politics of free being (AND others, thought strictly without relation.
