TOPICALITY 2AC
Counter-interpretation –
US Code, ’10 (“§ 8262. UNITED STATES DEMOCRACY ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS” Title 22, Chapter 89, Subchapter VI,
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/usc_sec_22_00008262----000-.html)
(b) Sense of Congress regarding mechanisms
mechanisms for United States democracy assistance.
We meet – IMET civil-military programming is democracy assistance
Carothers, Director of Democracy at Carnegie, ’99 (Thomas, “Aiding Democracy Abroad: the Learning Curve” p 196-197)
An additional area of democracy aid
The inclusion of these elements came after harsh domestic criticism of the U.S. military's long history of support for military forces involved in human rights abuses and military dictatorships.
Default to reasonability – literature checks abuse – our solvency evidence is specific to our aff and we have two pieces of evidence that indicate we are topical
Not a voter
EU CP 2AC
1. PERM DO BOTH
2. INT'L FIAT BAD - only counterplans that use the resolution’s agent disprove we should do the plan
Debate should be a method for making better decisions – our decisions determine the quality of our own life and those in our sphere of influence
A) Not transferable – no situation in our lives is replicated by the choice of counterplan – we can’t make others act, we can only influence their actions
B) No Literature – there’s none that takes the standpoint of an agent having to choose between the plan and counterplan – they sideline the formation of important information processing skills
C) Solves their offense – USFG can still influence other actors
3. US action is key – previous relationship means they’re more likely to say yes to US assistance because it’s readily established – current military aid makes the plan an implicit QPQ that generates strong leverage – extend Mitchell
4. Only the US can has enough influence to restrain Egypt’s military
Ash, Historian, political writer and Guardian columnist, 11
(5/18, Obama can now define the third great project of Euro-Atlantic partnership, www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/may/18/obama-define-great-euro-atlantic-project)
I do not say this for the sake of finding something
from an heir to Martin Luther King. Between them, these two events have already opened the new chapter.
5. Europe has no influence in Egypt due to US aid to SCAF – makes Egypt irrelevant for EU cred
Gowan, Director Center on International Coop at NYU, 2-2-’11 (Richard, “What Egypt Means for the EU” http://www.themarknews.com/articles/3973-what-egypt-means-for-the-eu)
Yet for all the talk of a “Global Europe,” the EU
Egyptian crisis as a decisive marker in Europe’s decline in the same way that we remember the 1956 Suez debacle?
Larivé, PhD Candidate IR U of Florida,’11 (Maxime, February, “The European Union, Tunisia and Egypt: Norms versus Interests -Thoughts and Recommendations” European Union Miami Analysis Series, http://aei.pitt.edu/29774/2/LariveEgyptEUMA2011edi.pdf)
However, the implementation of such a strategy created
we [Europeans] need to develop a strategic culture that fosters early, rapid, and when necessary, robust intervention.” 20
Ridzam, EU Ambassador, ‘7 (Datuk, May 6, “EU Can Use Past for Future Benefits” The New Straits Times, http://vlex.com/vid/can-use-past-for-future-benefits-78849630)
While it is foremost a global economic player,
if not, even disinterested in the rest of the world.
Terrorism ADD-ON
a) The aff is key to send a credible signal of US support for democratization – that’s 1AC Lahoud evidence. That’s key to solve terrorism
Zarate, Senior Advisor CSIS, 11
(Summer, Washington Quarterly, The battle for Reform with Al Qaeda)
Admittedly, in many quarters, the United States has not been
Combined with the killing of bin Laden, this could mark the beginning of the end of the long war.
b) Risk of bioterror attack high – most recent ev
NYT 10/26
(How Ready Are We for Bioterrorism?, www.nytimes.com/2011/10/30/magazine/how-ready-are-we-for-bioterrorism.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1)
A decade after the 9/11 attacks, it is easy to forget
We need a new model. This is never going to work.”
c) Extinction
Ochs, has published articles in the Baltimore Sun, Baltimore Chronicle, Science magazine and the website: www.freefromterror.net, past president of the Aberdeen Proving Ground Superfund Citizens Coalition, member of the Depleted Uranium Task force of the Military Toxics Project and a member of the Chemical Weapons Working Group, 6-9-2K2 (Richard, “BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS MUST BE ABOLISHED IMMEDIATELY,” http://www.freefromterror.net/other_articles/abolish.html)
Of all the weapons of mass destruction, the
. If patriotism would extinguish humanity, then patriotism is the highest of all crimes.
OBAMA GOOD DISAD 2AC
1. MPX DEFENSE
2. Obama won’t push the plan –
A. First – Obama will circumvent congress with unilateral executive action to get his agenda
Stokes, 10/24 (Bruce, 10/24/2011, Obama’s Other Power Tools; If Congress won’t help, the president can still use his executive leverage to push ahead with progressive goals,” )
Hands tied? Not so much.
initiatives through executive actions.
B. Second, plan implemented by the DOD and funded by the DOS
Moskowitz, Policy Planning Office at Office of Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, ‘8 (Elisa, December, “The creation of Expanded International Military Education and Training (E-IMET)” DISAM Journal)
Funding for IMET
U.S.-origin equipment. (3)
3. Democratic engagement with Egyptian military is a major foreign policy win
Lane, The News Tribune, 2-15-’11 (Charles, “Obama can reap political capital from revolt in Egypt” http://www.thenewstribune.com/2011/02/15/1545321/obama-can-reap-political-capital.html)
Still, even after the resignation of Hosni Mubarak,
time and energy in Egypt over the rest of his term.
4. E-IMET not controversial
Moskowitz, Policy Planning Office at Office of Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, ‘8 (Elisa, December, “The creation of Expanded International Military Education and Training (E-IMET)” DISAM Journal)
The catalyst for the initiative was
to ensure that it met the intent of Congress. (12)
5. Biden, not Obama, does the personal lobbying for legislation
Wilson, 10/9 --- covers the White House for the Washington Post (10/9/2011, Scott, The Washington Post, “The loner president,” Factiva)
Obama prefers wrestling with policy over engaging with people
the issue the public ranked as most important - above all else.
6. Legislative win is key to boost Obama’s political clout and pass the agenda
Cohn & Clift, 9/23 (Douglas Cohn and Eleanor Clift, “Obama cannot bypass Congress,” http://www.poconorecord.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20110923/NEWS04/109230324/-1/news04)
WASHINGTON — President Obama is traveling
White House and Congress, and it's hard to see Obama getting them back on track.
7. 9/11 created strong bipartisan support for democracy assistance – Arab Spring reignited it
Democracy Digest, 9-8-’11 (“9/11 restored bipartisan consensus on strategic value of democracy assistance”http://www.demdigest.net/blog/2011/09/911-restored-bipartisan-consensus-on-strategic-value-of-democracy-assistance/
“The terrorist attack of 9/11 changed America
sharp partisan division here at home is worthy of note
8. Clinton and Obama are pressuring – its inevitable
VOA 11/10 (Voice of America is an international multimedia broadcasting service funded by the U.S. government through the Broadcasting Board of Governor, “Clinton presses china on trade, human rights issues”, 10 November 2011, http://blogs.voanews.com/breaking-news/2011/11/10/clinton-presses-china-on-trade-human-rights-issues/)
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
tariffs against China if the currency imbalance continues.]
9. US continuing to pressure China
China Daily 11/10 (“US to keep pressure on yeah at APEC”, 10 November 2011, http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/usa/business/2011-11/10/content_14073975.htm)
HONOLULU - China's currency will
Assistant Secretary Charles Collyns said on Monday.
ANTHROPOCENTRISM K COERCION 2AC
1. 1. FAiling to prevent a horrible outcome is just as bad as causing it – the aff is moral evasion
Nielsen – philosophy prof, Calgary - 93
Kai Nielsen, Professor of Philosophy, University of Calgary, Absolutism and Its Consequentialist Critics, ed. Joram Graf Haber, 1993, p. 170-2
Forget the levity of the example and consider
way but this does not make it right.
1. 2. Voting neg doesn’t necessitate absolute utilitarianism – there is a high threshold past which we should compromise morals to avoid catastrophic consequences
Moore – law prof, U San Diego – ‘97
Michael Moore, Warren Distinguished Professor of Law at University of San Diego School of Law, 1997, Placing Blame, p. 719-722
Non-Absolute Moral Norms: Threshold Deontology
will operate as absolutely as absolutism in its ban on torturing the innocent.
1. 3. NUClear war must be prohibited absolutely
Kateb, Professor of Politics at Princeton University, ‘92 (George, “The Inner Ocean” p 111-112)
Schell's work attempts to force on
perhaps enjoined, to take the appropriate preserving steps.
GOODIN 1995 (Robert E. Goodin, Professor of Social Sciences & Philosopher at the Research School of Social Sciences at Australian National University, Utilitarianism as a Public Philosophy, p. 8-10)
The strength of utilitarianism
) a particularly attractive posture for public officials to adopt.
1. 5. Must choose the lesser evil - Not all situations have a moral solution
Thomas Nagel, Professor of Philosophy, New York University, Absolutism and Its Consequentialist Critics, ed. Joram Graf Haber, 1993, p. 234-5
Having described the elements of the absolutist position
It appears that it may be an evil place as well.
1. 6. Risking extinction not ethical- precludes ethical behavior
Elliott ‘97
(Herschel, Feb. 26, Emeritus Assoc. Prof. of Philo @ U. of Florida, “A General Statement of the Tragedy of the Commons”, dieoff.org, www.dieoff.org/page121.htm; Jacob)
Specifically, Hardin's thought experiment with an imaginary commons demonstrates the futility
which denies the possibility of further ethical behavior.
1. 7. No offense- appealing to consequences inevitable
Richard A. Epstein, James Parker Hall Distinguished Service Professor of Law, University of Chicago, Boston University Law Review, 76 B.U.L. Rev. 1, February / April, 1996
Similarly, on questions of method, I believe that
to justify rules in terms of the consequences they bring about. n8
1. 8. We have an obligation to protect future generations, even if we can’t “know” they exist
Smart, Professor of Philosophy at the Research School of Social Sciences, and Williams, Professor of Philosophy at the University of Cambridge, '73 (JJC and Bernard, "Utilitarianism: For and Against" p 62-63)
"But", the deontologist may still object
present population on a strange island before using it for bomb tests?
1.